Tags
1930s, 1937, British, British Library Classics, Christmas mystery, ghost story, Golden Age mystery, J. Jefferson Farjeon, mystery, Poisoned Pen Press, psionics
It’s surprising to think how far the British Library Crime Classics line has come. The early releases—three books between 2012 and 2013—didn’t even feature the vibrant color scheme and artwork now associated with the books. It existed a bit under-the-radar until December of 2014, when their release of J. Jefferson Farjeon’s Mystery in White became a runaway holiday success. The Christmas mystery flew off the shelves, attracting a wider audience than just Golden Age mystery fans. Because of its success and the attention it brought, the Crime Classics releases were doubled in 2015, re-introducing more authors and even branching out into original anthologies of classic mystery stories.
But who was J. Jefferson Farjeon? A dominant force during the Golden Age, who wrote over sixty novels between 1924 and the time of his death in 1955. Dorothy Sayers called him “unsurpassed for creepy skill in mysterious adventures” as several of his novels involved supernatural themes, or were early thrillers in the John Buchan vein. But with his novels long out of print, he remained something of a forgotten figure known only to more studious Golden Age fans and historians. That’s what makes the wild success of Mystery in White so intriguing; a forgotten novel by a forgotten author, not tied to any new movie release and selling largely by word of mouth, selling out at Britain’s largest bookseller and the world’s largest online book retailer. Whatever the reason, I’m very glad it became a bestseller and catapulted the line to success.
It all starts on a train, now snowbound and forlorn on a cold Christmas Eve. With the train going nowhere, one car’s passengers decide to risk trekking across the open tundra to reach the nearest train station. But in the white-out, all they find are a series of ditches, and eventually a house—its door unlocked, tea boiling on the stove, fireplace roaring with warmth, and not a soul around to answer them. Trapped in the house is a neat group of characters: a platinum blonde chorus girl; aristocratic (and argumentative) siblings David and Lydia Carrington; aspirational but fever-ravaged clerk Robert Thomson; elderly bore Mr. Hopkins, droning on about his time in the Yukon or India; and Sir Edward Maltby of the Royal Psychical Society. Somewhere, also, is the reason behind the abandoned house: the people who abandoned it, perhaps a murderer or two…
Farjeon’s writing is sharp; this novel has plenty of witty wordplay on display and an air of amusing joviality. Overall, it’s an easygoing and fun read, thanks in part to Farjeon’s prose—he is quite capable of grabbing your attention and keeping it, especially with several thrilling developments that occur early in the novel. His characterization is quite good, and the main group of characters is well-drawn, though there’s a troubling undercurrent of classism. One stranger that they bump into is immediately identified as a “Cockney,” which also paints him as the villain of the piece—not because he’s the only person around, but because he’s one of those dreadful commons—and the characters make several catty references to those less witty and refined as themselves. And while Farjeon starts off so well—the idea and first half-dozen or so chapters are excellent at drawing the characters and setting—his plotting wears thin when the dénouement stretches on, and ends up about twice as long as it needs to be.
Mystery in White also adds a supernatural elements via Maltby of the Royal Psychical Society, becoming not just a Christmas mystery but also something of a Christmas ghost story. Maltby is the investigator who susses out the who’s and why’s, but I found him very obnoxious as a character—he would routinely interrupt and insult some characters, and his bad habit of being right all the time makes him come across as smug. While I enjoy a good ghost story, I’m less enthused about supernatural elements in what I’d assumed was a straight-laced mystery—after all, isn’t there a reason supernatural explanations were considered a no-go by the Rules of Fair Play? When it’s heavily implied that Maltby’s psychical potency is the source of his astute observations, and thus the source for his solution, I’m inclined to roll my eyes—it’s a bit too silly for me.
Perhaps I’m being a bit too hard on the novel, because it certainly is a fun, refreshing read—it makes an ideal stocking-stuffer, an amusing country house mystery that happens to be holiday-themed. It’s not Farjeon’s best, yet even as an average read it has a great deal of charm, and I can see why it became such an overnight sensation last year. For pure readability and entertainment, Farjeon impresses, and I’ll be sure to revisit his works as the British Library series continues to re-release them.
Book Details
Title: Mystery in White
Editor: J. Jefferson Farjeon
First Published Date: 1937
What I Read: ebook
Price I Paid: $6.99
MSRP: $15 paperback / $6.99 ebook
ISBN/ASIN: 071235770X / B00O16VACQ
realthog said:
A splendid account.
I don’t think you’re being too hard on the novel at all. I have my own difficulties with it. While I’m delighted that it launched the success of the BL’s classic-mystery line, it annoyed me in more ways than I can possibly enumerate. I made some notes here.
I keep meaning to read more of his books, though, because it seems like overall he was a very interesting author.
LikeLiked by 2 people
admiral.ironbombs said:
I have to agree with everything you’ve written—I hadn’t even considered the inanity of David wandering around in a dark blizzard inspecting footprints, but to be frank I was already on autopilot by then, and started skimming after the “Nora’s Story” segment.
LikeLike
ravenking81 said:
I wanted to like this more than I did. Just like you wrote it starts out really well, but runs out of steam far before the end. I also agree about the problems with the characters, some of them seeming more like caricatures than believable people. Still compared to Mavis Doriel Hay’s The Santa Claus Mystery this is probably a masterpiece.
Interestingly this novel reminded me a bit of “Fire Will Freeze” by Margaret Millar which has a similar premise, though there it is a bus rather than a train which gets stuck in a snowdrift, the passengers leave and come upon a strange house in the middle of nowhere, and soon there is a murder. The Millar book came out a few years later, and I don’t know whether it was inspired by MIW, but I found Millar’s handling of the idea more convincing than Farjeon’s.
Btw, I love those snowflakes. They might be only virtual, but they give the site a nice Christmas touch 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
I’ve heard a lot of negative comments about Hay’s Santa Claus Murder that I’m wary of reading it, and I was hoping that Mystery in White, as the line’s bestseller would be a better read. Still not perfect, but oh well.
Fascinating info about the Millar novel! I have no doubt she handled the ideas better, and I’ll have to keep a look out for a copy. As for the snowflakes, it’s a seasonal WordPress feature I often forgot I’ve turned on—nice and festive, and hopefully not too distracting. Thanks for the comments!
LikeLiked by 1 person
armchairreviewer said:
I think probably I’m in the minority when I say I found this my favourite Farjeon novel, with The Z Murders as second, The House Opposite, third and Thirteen Guests as my least favourite. I just thought that Farjeon balanced his writing styles best in this novel, as I don’t think he is very good at writing a straight detective novel and leans more strongly to being a thriller writer. Moreover, I don’t remember there being such a silly pair of young people in this novel as there is in The Z Murders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
I read The Z Murders this summer and though it held up very favorably to the thrillers of its day—especially better than Buchan’s 39 Steps, which I read not too many years ago. I think you’re on to something by noting Farjeon’s strengths aren’t at the straight detective novel… for me his style succeeds best when he’s keeping a breathless pace with a bit more excitement and suspense in the air. Perhaps not as silly a pair as in The Z Murders, but the Carrington siblings have their moments…
LikeLike
JJ said:
I don’t disagree with your feelings here, but I also really liked how it didn’t turn out to be quite the comfortable mystery I was expecting when I read it: some of what goes on is nonsense, but then there are some wonderful passages of great suspense and a very interesting detective character (is he smug? Yeah, possibly…)!.
I also agree with you take on Farjeon’s writing: he has a great turn of phrase and is very witty at times. And, yes, it is really rather overlong, and he’s not really a big fan of commoners, is he?
LikeLiked by 2 people
armchairreviewer said:
You make an interesting point about commoners. Can’t really remember his take on them in this book, but with The House Opposite, on the one hand you could say he does have a tramp as a central character and is portrayed in a likeable way, but on the other hand there are moments where the narrator seems to see themselves and the reader as above Ben, the tramp intellectually. So I think it is a tricky one to decide.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
It’s those moments of great suspense, and those excellent turns of phrase and witty banter, that keeps me reading Farjeon—his writing I find very appealing even though I had some issues with this novel. It’s why I keep reading his works, and with sixty-some novels, odds are I’ll like at least some of them!
LikeLike
Peter S said:
I’m glad to hear that this series has been successful. My wife likes the ‘golden age’ mysteries, so I bought her two from this series this year. It must help that they’ve been doing such a good job with the cover art. Reminds me of the New York Review Books Classics style of cover art.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
Great point about the cover similarities with the New York Review Books Classics, another great line of literature… Hadn’t thought of that before!
LikeLike
Cavershamragu said:
I have bought this for a couple of friends and family members but not read it – what little I have samples of Farjeon didn’t leave much of an impression but it was long ago. Thanks Chris, I am very pleased that the BL series is doing so well – hope it goes on forever.
LikeLike