Tags
1940s, 1950s, 1952, Ace Books, Astounding Science Fiction, Clifford Simak, Edward Valigursky, evolutionary transcendence, fixup novel, Gnome Press, International Fantasy Award winner, Kelly Freas, Locus Award nominee, mutants, Open Road Media, psychological, robots!, science fiction, Sphere, transhumanism
Clifford Simak’s fame has waned in the years after his death, and he never was one of the more well-known or popular SF authors to begin with. He broke onto the SF scene in 1944 with a series of semi-linked short stories and novellas, a future-history that took humanity out of its near-future cites, into star-studded galaxies, even beyond mere homo sapiens. He continued writing them through 1947, then published one final tale in 1951, at which point they were joined together and sold as the fixup novel City. (One more was added in 1971 in a volume honoring editor John W. Campbell, who had published all but one of the others in Astounding Science Fiction.) It remains something of a minor classic to this day, having made quite an impact in introducing Simak’s pastoral and mournful themes to science fiction.
City‘s frame story comes in the form of academic notes left by humanity’s successor, intelligent dogs uplifted by a man named Webster. Each of City‘s stories are part of the dogs’ oral history, myths passed down from generation to generation of a race called humans—whose existence is hotly contested. And each of the stories follows some humans of the Webster family, telling of the Websters’ roles across human history, both successes and failures. Readers who see SF as an attempt at prediction/prophecy will be disappointed with the direction Simak takes his future history; those of us more interested in the story’s insights or context have a wealth of material at hand.
“City” starts off strong with its pastoral, mournful atmosphere; in a predicted post-War future, where cheap atomic-powered aircraft sees decentralized population centers end the Cold War—why live in a city when you can live in the beautiful country and commute in a ten-minute plane ride? “City” imagines the decline of the city, with the Webster family one of the last inhabitants of a dying town; it’s followed up by “Huddling Place,” one of the most effective stories in the collection. “Huddling Place” deals with the fallout of this shift—the Webster of the next generation is a brilliant surgeon with an acute case of agoraphobia; despite the pastoral beginnings, Simak seems to be implying that the fiction flight to rural life had unintended consequences. (A few other humans become mutants with strange abilities, possibly also due to the societal shift.) The issue is compacted by a summons to save the live of one of his friends, a Martian philosopher, and the story is a decent psychological tale as Webster struggles to overcome his fears.
The science and logic behind Simak’s tales often require a leap of faith; I’m not sure I agree that technology would lead to shrinking urban centers, though it’s a nice utopian idea and makes for a fascinating story. More often than not I find them a success of pathos over logos—also, both a contrast to other SF of the era, and direct commentary on its point in time. “Desertion,” the other stand-out story in the book, sees a Jupiter survey mission open a gateway to transcendence, where humans remake themselves anew and flee into their posthuman future. It happens to be the first of these stories that Simak wrote (in 1943, though it was published fourth), a direct reaction to early reports from Europe about the Holocaust—actually per Simak, the entire book “was written in a revulsion against mass killing and as a protest against war.” There’s something poignant about “Desertion,” where an author so disillusioned with humanity’s propensity for violence reshapes this nature by way of fiction. For me, knowing the historical context amplifies the utopian fantasy themes.
The stories continue to develop and escalate along those lines; robotics and artificial intelligence are developed, and uplifted man’s best friend to sentience. By the time of the sixth story “Hobbies,” there is only one city left, Geneva, in which the few listless humans who won’t leave for Jovian transcendence struggle to find a purpose—facing an apocalypse of pastoral isolation. Humankind drifts off into the ether, taking the “long sleep” of cryogenics or becoming more-than-human on Jupiter, leaving Earth behind for its servitors—its creations, the uplifted dogs and the robots, left to guard and guide the world in humanity’s absence. And despite some wraithlike alien presence only the dogs can detect, the dogs develop their own utopia free of violence and want. Yet they too are fallible, with exactly the opposite flaws compared to the humans. Each of the stories is outlined by notes from doggish scholars, and the dogs’ role in the tales increases as humanity’s fades.
If commentary by way of sentient dogs sounds a bit ridiculous or cheesy, note that there is (or at least was) a firm debate on whether they added or subtracted from the novel. On the one hand, the stories stand on their own fairly well, while the doggish commentary often includes twee jokes, and ham-handedly ram home points that the stories were quite capable of making. On the other hand, the dogs’ analysis of each story brings out more of Simak’s points and themes; he uses them to isolate and outline the philosophical issues his stories raise—in between a few bad jokes (the one where dog scholars believe “woman” and “wife” to be interchangeable with “female” felt painfully antiquated). The idea of a sentient, uplifted dog doesn’t concern me, though to be honest I think the stories are more poignant without the introductions.
Because, you see, the stories aren’t about the dogs—despite what the cover may indicate. Even when all who remain are dogs, the dogs are used to display the absence of humans. City is about humanity, how it changes over time and reacts to the fictional situations Simak places it in. The book raises some fascinating questions about progress and intelligence and human nature. Simak was ahead of the curve in penning stories that were often more philosophical and cerebral, especially compared to neighboring stories in Astounding—Asimov’s robot mysteries, Kuttner’s robot puzzles, and an onslaught of Hard SF: can-do engineers overcoming obstacles and adventures in rigorous physics speculation.
City demands that its readers accept its conceits—with the dogs, with the gaps in logic and science, and with some of its more inventive and wild themes (malevolent mutant psychics, for one). If you can accept that imaginative vision knowing it is not real but a dream, you’ll find some of the best SF stories from the 1940s. Its pages are full of potent and insightful ideas, the novel being a subtle-but-deep examination of multiple themes told using Simak’s soft touch and pastoral ambiance. It’s also deceptively good, and remains a more than worthy read—it remains a classic of science fiction, underrated and forgotten though it is.
I recieved an eARC from NetGalley and Open Road Media in exchange for this open and honest review. If you want a fascinating article in agreement, here’s Robert Silverberg’s reflection on Simak; if you’d like a more critical view, Jesse at Speculiction hammered most of the salient points.
Book Details
Title: City
Author: Clifford Simak
Publisher: OpenRoadMedia
Release Date: 21 July 2015
What I Read: ebook
Price I Paid: $0 (eARC via Netgalley)
ISBN/ASIN: 1504013034 / B00YO78T1M
First published: 1943-1971 (short stories), 1952 (novel)
Bill Crider said:
I read this back in the ’50s at an impressionable age, and it remains one of my very favorite SF novels. Simak remains a favorite writer, too, certainly one of my Top Ten. I like just about everything he wrote.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bill Crider said:
Should also have mentioned that “Desertion,” one of the bits included here, is one of my favorite stories of any kind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
Every Simak novel I read confirms that he was vastly underrated… a wonderfully unique approach to SF. And I agree on “Desertion;” I read it in one of the Asimov Presents the Great SF Stories volumes years ago, and I was impressed all over again when I read it this month.
LikeLiked by 1 person
antyphayes said:
Thanks for the review. I read this almost 30 years ago and at the time was resistant to its “outdatedness”. In the meantime my tastes in sf have changed, being redirected to older works over the new, so perhaps it’s time to revisit this.
In the course of my studies over the years I discovered that City exerted a considerable influence on Henri Lefebvre, a French Marxist philosopher and sociologist who wrote a number of works on the city and the “critique of urbanism” in the 1960s and 70s. He mentions it in the following interview: https://libcom.org/library/lefebvre-situationists-interview
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
The “outdatedness” is definitely a turn-off for many readers, but that also gives it a unique charm. Fascinating interview with Lefebvre, and I can imagine it being very influential with its non-urban future—thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
antyphayes said:
Thankfully I’ve gotten over my problems with “old” sf. Indeed I’ve gone in the opposite direction and now rarely read anything written after the 1970s.
One of the things I find interesting about Lefebvre is that he was not alone in citing the influence of sf on his theoretical work (for instance his one time student Jean Baudrillard was a vocal fan of PK Dick and JG Ballard). Perhaps there was less stigma attached to such admissions amongst left wing critics in France in the 1950s and 60s?
LikeLike
fromcouchtomoon said:
Finally a BTYC review! Gosh, I want to read this so bad. I’ll need some time away from your review to forget everything, but I love what I’ve read from Simak so far. Based on your description, it reminds me a lot of Lester Del Rey’s “The Faithful” (1938), though I’m sure Simak’s vision is much more sophisticated. I am sucker for utopian idealism, no matter how cynical I try to be, and Simak gets me every time. My next Simak will probably be All Flesh is Grass.
Funny you mention the criticism of human withdrawal from urban centers at the upstart of techno-utopia. I’ve lately had a probably rural-typical reaction to some of the leftist thinkers I read and listen to because it seems like so much of their visions are so urban-centric, and I always wonder if they’ve forgotten that a huge chunk of humanity lives nowhere near urban centers. Obviously, human migratory patterns are and have been moving toward large cities, but that pattern seems to limit the imaginations of futurist thinkers. Simak is the only one, and maybe Bradbury, who I think wrote SF with the so-called bread basket areas in mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
It’s been a while, hasn’t it? 😦 There are quite a few similarities with “The Faithful” but Simak’s felt more mature and insightful, if also deeply cynical—there’s a bitter edge to the mournful parts. It also felt like it was trying to be more literary for its time, which (as a fan of ’40s SF) isn’t saying as much as it could. I have not read All Flesh is Grass so I look forward to a review where you can enlighten me on it.
It’s odd that two elements of the novel catch a lot of flak—how the dogs are uplifted (a few surgeries, and suddenly they’re born intelligent), and the rural retreat. I realize that de-urbanization isn’t realistic, but I’m saddened that it’s “too much” for some readers—isn’t the point of having fiction genres of the fantastic to examine, y’know, fantastic and wondrous concepts that don’t exist in reality? The novel really gets you thinking about the role of urban centers, at least.
I agree, our urban centers have restricted the imagination of futurists—for the same reasons gender inequality and ghettos are still transported to the glittering future cities of SF. (If someone spends billions to make an asteroid habitable, I’m pretty sure they’re not going to remember to zone for slums.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
fromcouchtomoon said:
Ah, yes, you did mention mournfulness and disillusionment, which is the other edge of Simak’s humanist sword.
I’ll have to see if the uplifted dog element bothers me, but it’s a trope I’m used to and who doesn’t sometimes wish they could talk to animals? (“Excuse me, sir, could you please stop barking? I’m trying to sleep.”) And when it comes to sciency uplift or human improvement projects, I’m never really concerned about the hows or possibilities of doing it as I am about how the author envisions that world with those changes. Sure, I’ll suspend disbelief for uplifted dogs, but not for ax beheadings in a universe with jump drives, or post-apoc dystopias that run out of canned soup in two weeks. Because that’s ridiculous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Peter S said:
‘mournful’ is a good word to use to describe Simak, I think he is also cautiously optimistic. I wasn’t aware of the influence the Holocaust had on Simak, that was an interesting point.
Also, i had never seen the Freas cover art before. While I like his work, it can sometimes be a bit too “jokey”, but his cover for City is very good.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cavershamragu said:
Thanks Chris – very hard to resist your enthusiasm for this one! Shall eek it out
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joachim Boaz said:
I think what struck me first about the work when I read it as a young teen was the mournful quality. The tone and atmosphere really resonated with me — I wonder if I would enjoy it any more considering the only Simak novel that has really blown me away since then was Why Call Them Back From Heaven? (1967) which is even more dark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joachim Boaz said:
I also think Eddie Jones’ cover is a really poor imitation/evocation of the far superior Valigursky cover. That might be Valigursky’s best!
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
I have to agree, Jones’ cover is too clearly a knockoff of Valigursky’s more interesting original.
Have you read Way Station or Time is the Simplest Thing yet? The only other review you’ve posted was A Choice of Gods, and that was dipping into Simak’s “meh” period. If you find you really enjoy those two, City might be worth revisiting.
LikeLike
nikki @bookpunks said:
I loved your use of “ham-handedly.” 🙂
I am firmly on the side of people who hate talking animals in fiction, so this book has that against it for me, though the ideas explored sound really interesting. And now that I know that both you and Megan really like this guy, I am going to have to make a note.
LikeLiked by 1 person
admiral.ironbombs said:
That is a favorite phrase of mine 🙂
If you’re firmly against talking animals, I can see keeping clear of this one… I don’t think he wrote any post-apocalyptic stuff, but you could try Way Station, Time is the Simplest Thing, or Why Call Them Back From Heaven? instead to get a good taste of what Simak’s pastoral SF utopias are all about.
LikeLike
realthog said:
City isn’t my favorite Simak (that’d probably be Way Station. although it has competition), but it’s still up there among my favorite Simak novels: it certainly had a profound effect on me when I read maybe 40 or 50 years ago in that I can still remember my response to it.
I’m surprised by the meme that Simak was underrated. Back in the day, he was very highly rated. He was a master of what you might call pastoral sf. Some of the later novels were a bit rote, but who could forget (aside from City and Way Station) such pieces as All Flesh is Grass, The Big Front Yard, Time and Again, Time Is the Simplest Thing, They Walked Like Men and, a personal favorite, Ring Around the Sun?
From Why Call Them Back From Heaven? onward I felt he went downhill a bit, although his novels were never other than readable. Whenever I pick up one of his best these days for a reread I can’t help but think how well his work has aged by comparison with that of, say, Asimov.
LikeLiked by 2 people
admiral.ironbombs said:
I can easily imagine it having a profound effect on a reader, because it had a profound effect on me!
The reason I refer to Simak as underrated is based on the perception that he isn’t read as much these days—though, this could be because anyone writing over 30 years ago tends to get labeled something like “unsung” or “underrated.” Simak’s on both of those, for example. (Yet I can glance at my shelves, and see books by nearly all of those “underrated” authors.) When Jack Vance is the first author mentioned in an “underrated” thread, it makes me wonder how many readers today read the SF of yesteryear…
But at least Simak won several awards, and was very well-regarded in his day—even through the ’70s, when he was publishing… lesser novels, he was still praised in anthologies and magazines for his earlier achievements.
LikeLike
realthog said:
Oops. Not “it’s still up there among my favorite Simak novels”! I meant to say: “it’s still up there among my favorite sf novels.” It would probably be in my top 100, where there are several others of CDS’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vintage45 said:
I’ve read this several times over the years and always enjoyed it. It got to me to reading his other works. The Valigursky cover is my favorite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: 2015 In Review | Battered, Tattered, Yellowed, & Creased
Pingback: Grotto of the Dancing Deer – The Complete Clifford D. Simak, Vol. 4 | Battered, Tattered, Yellowed, & Creased
ivana split said:
city sounds like an interesting novel even if a bit updated:)
Plus, I like dogs:)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Review: City by Clifford D. Simak – Brave New World of Books and Culture