Tags
1960s, 1969, alternate realities, Bantam, cryogenics, Dell, Gene Szafran, Gollancz SF Masterworks, Jeff Jones, Philip K. Dick, psionics, religion, science fiction
Instant Ubik has all the fresh flavor of just-brewed coffee. Your husband will say, Christ, Sally, I used to think your coffee was only so-so. But now, wow! Safe when taken as directed.
There’s a commercial battle between the psychics and the “prudence organizations” that keep them out of paying customers’ heads. Glen Runciter runs one of those prudence organizations with his deceased wife, Ella—the fact that she’s dead isn’t an obstacle, as she’s one of many kept in half-life at a moratorium, existing i cyronic suspension that gives her limited consciousness and the ability to communicate. When a wealthy business magnate has reason to believe his moon-based organization was infiltrated by psychics, Runciter assembles a team of 11 anti-psi operatives, including his main troubleshooter, Joe Chip, and Chip’s newest protege—Pat Conley, a mysterious young woman with the ability to travel into the past and reverse psi-manipulated events. This is all a sham, a means to get Runciter’s best and brightest alone with a bomb.
Glen Runciter is dead—or is it that everyone else died, hallucinating as they enter their own cryonic half-life? Joe Chip doesn’t know, struggling to make sense of increasingly surreal occurrences and keep his team together. There’s the fact that any cigarettes and food they touch is already spoiled, that the money in their pockets is regressing to 1930s-vintage… when it’s not emblazoned with Runciter’s image. And there’s the continual advertisements for the ubiquitous Ubik—an aerosol spray, an elixer, an uncture—which promises to be the wonder-drug that will cure all of their needs. Joe Chip wants answers—what causes the regression, why is Runciter appearing everywhere, who is killing off his team one by one and leaving their withered husks behind—but the secret, and salvation, lies with a heaping dose of Ubik.
Needless to say, this is Philip K. Dick marinating in another surreal melange of paranoia and uncertainty, boiled down to a point where neither the characters or the reader know half of what’s going on until the bitter end… and even then, the answers you got are themselves left in question. Instead of the usual questioning of identity, memory, and/or humanity, though, Ubik questions reality itself. It captures elements from Dick’s ’50s stories, heavy on paranoid protagonists chased by events beyond his control, and his truly psychadelic, trippin’-balls work from the ’70s. It’s more complex and complete compared to his earlier works, but more accessible than many of the ’70s novels turned out to be. And while his prose is still a bit pulpish, and though he couldn’t write female characters worth a damn, the overall effect is impressive. Ubik is something of an existential horror story, an excellent introduction to Dick’s recurring theme, another step in his repetitive cycle of trying to examine and define what is real, what is human, and what is simply an illusion.
One of the core elements of Ubik is capitalism; not quite a satire, but a madcap jumble of what a future dominated by ad-men and coin commerce would look like. The fact that Runciter’s organization is ostensibly competing against a corporation of psychics is pretty nuts, and the lack of any oversight is pure “guiding hand of the market” there—in our post-9/11 world, I think most fictional governments would throw the psychics in concentration camps. Then there’s the Ubik ads, reading like a greatest-hits of vintage advertising or a ’50s ad-man’s worst nightmare. Dick begins each chapter with a new and fascinating ad for Ubik—as instant coffee, a household cleaner, sleep medication, breakfast treats, and various other fast-acting, new-and-improved, solves-all-your-needs products. (Safe when taken as directed.) While the book covers immortalize it as using the most ’50s of delivery methods—the aerosol spray can—it also shows up in a few bottles purloined from a nineteenth-century snakeoil salesman.
Meanwhile, there’s a deep and abiding fascination with coin-operated everythings—it’s a way to point out Joe Chip’s poverty when doors and appliances demand a toll, and lets Dick have the neat trick of money showing up with Runciter’s face on it (another heaping dose of metaphor right there), but it also posits a very strange future. Coin-op television was used as a scare-tactic by broadcast networks, a kind of “pay TV will lead to the end of everything” tactic re-used against cable, but Dick takes that an runs wild adding change slots to everything. That, and his strange future fashion sense, are the kinds of crazed attention to detail that I love about Dick. I’m not sure if he thought he was being prophetic or if it was from his copious use of drugs, but this assortment of screwball details is so blindingly unique that nobody else could have come up with it.
Not too many years ago, Time put Ubik on its list of the top hundred books since 1923, one of the few science fiction pieces to make the cut. It’s recognition like that which keeps Ubik from being overlooked in Dick’s bibliography, even though (unlike Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) it’s potentially unfilmable, and (unlike Man in the High Castle) it didn’t win any awards. I find it hard to be objective about Ubik because it’s my favorite of Philip K Dick’s works, a masterpiece of paranoia that’s strange, surreal, and crazed… but not so much that it’s it inaccessible for a reader. The weirdness keeps up with the pacing, the surprise reveals are unexpected even though Dick has already shown you the pieces, and you leave the novel both disoriented and exhilarated. This is required reading to earn your science fiction fandom badge, a work of pure genius, or pure madness, possibly the result of both working as one.
Book Details
Title: Ubik
Editor: Philip K. Dick
Publisher: Mariner Books
First Published: 1969
What I Read: SFBC omnibus Counterfeit Unrealities
MSRP: $13.95 pb / $9.99 ebook
Price I Paid: $12
ISBN/ASIN: 978-0547572291 / B005LVR6ZA
I have to say that I’ve preferred “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep” and “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch”,not to mention “The Man in the High Castle” to “Ubik”.I’m quite keen,which you probably think sounds blasphemous,on the “Galactic Pot-Healer” and “Time Out of Joint”.TOOJ still maintained a crucial balance between reality and the psychadelic internal world,that would disappear in the later,mature novels,but is a compact,well developed novel that is nicely sown together and well resolved.
We are introduced earlier to the concept of half life and the characters who will play a major part in the strange drama,but much of the early section of the book that leads to the supposed death of Glen Runciter,has really nothing to do with the important later events,and seems like unnecessary rigmarol I thought.Being a fairly short novel,much of the build-up to the main plot therefore,means that it had little space left and seems rushed and fails to develope,unlike for example,the brilliant “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch”.I think it would have been better starting from scratch like “The Man in the High Castle”,that gradually revealed it’s mysteries.
However,it’s difficult to disagree with you about “Ubik” being exceptional,despite my personal,reserved feelings.It’s definitely infused with a crazy,demonic energy that makes it mesmorising.It’s a treat for any real fan of Dick’s obviously,and has a farcical tone that prevents you taking the dark subject matter seriously,unlike his other novels like “A Maze of Death”.It still soars far above a multitude of SF novels,that most authors would probably trade their literary milk teeth for!
I definately agree with you about the theme of capitalism in it though.It’s infused with so much theological fizz like “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch”,where God and consummerism,in this case the product Ubik,seem inseparable.The quotidian world contains hidden meaning.It’s something that only the unique mind of Dick could have conjured I think.
It certainly is one of his most ambitious and daring novels,despite any flaws.It’s not a bad novel to start for any new readers to his stuff.Last year I reread “The Man in the High Castle” and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep”,so perhaps I should do so with this one,and I might come out with a different appraisal this time.
I’ve nearly always thought of Dick as a superior SF author with very few equals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This review makes me very happy. You hit on a lot of the things that I appreciate in Ubik. My thinking about Ubik has been confused since reading Exegesis, which has shed light on things that seem, well, more imaginary than the story itself, and has fuzzed up my initial thoughts about Ubik. I think the Forward to Exegesis says PKD thought it was funny that all his “Marxist” friends thought his books were about anti-capitalism because he seemed to think he wasn’t writing about those things… really, Phil? It makes me wonder if he said that because he couldn’t stand the idea of state control, either, and didn’t want people to interpret his book as a socialist treatise. The thing is, nobody’s saying it’s a novel promoting socialism, but it is denigrating capitalism. And, of course, lots of the things Dick satirizes in his stories involve components of bureaucracy and authority, and those elements exist in any large-scale government/economic system, but, like you mentioned with the ads and the coin-operated door, he does address specific capitalist traits in Ubik.
And Runciter… I am so confused about Runciter now that I’m reading Exegesis…
Your review also makes me happy because it fits really well with my upcoming post about it. Perhaps I should post it this week…
LikeLiked by 3 people
I think you’re right about his stance on capitalism,but what did he like really?Apparently,he also didn’t like communism,which is surely exactly the opposite to his anti capitalistic views!I’m referring to the novellette,”Faith of Our Fathers”,which like “Ubik” and the “The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch”,has a strong theological underlining to the drab political theme.It’s closer however to TTSOPE than “Ubik”,where apparently capitalism becomes salvific through Ubik,where a virulent creator god,is all consuming and pluriform.
I think it’s because he must have seen both capitalism and communism as fascistic.”The Man in the High Castle” says it all eloquently,yes?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“but what did he like really?” Exactly. In PKD world, anything “establishment” is bad. I’m just barely scratching the PKD surface, so I’ll be more proficient about major PKD works in the coming year.
LikeLike
It seems that all governments in his stuff are oppressive and deceive the masses.It’s ususally morally ambibuous though and there for their protection.Freedom and revelation means they have to cope with uncomfortable truths that fail to release them from their condition.
It appears he didn’t know what he wanted.He suffered the same existential crisis as his fictional characters.
LikeLike
Thanks for commenting, Megan! (I was kind of wondering if my review was going to be last, since it seemed I started reading when everyone else was already done reading, but I guess I had it scheduled first…)
No, PKD didn’t have any love for state control. I don’t see him as a big fan of Socialism—he threw Stanisław Lem under the bus, and reported him to the FBI as a “composite committee operating on Communist orders to sway public opinion” or somesuch—but his work sure deals a lot with capitalistic rat-races, ad-men futures, bureaucratic intrusion, etc. I chalk some of it up to the California counter-culture which Dick would have been living in.
And yeah, reading the Exegesis gives you a whole new perspective on Ubik. Though some of the metaphysical ramblings are a bit out there—whenever he starts talking about time, I start thinking of that crazy Time Cube site. I saw your comments to Nikki and agree 100%, I’m fascinated by Dick’s attempts to interpret and analyze the works of a strange, alien author—himself!—as he keeps working on his hypotheses about what Ubik is really about…
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems a shame and strange that Dick took the proverbial sledgehammer to Lem.He threw contempt on virtually all the then contemporary American SF authors,showering the highest praise on Dick.It’s also ironic,as he was scathing in his fiction of the kind of government that hhe saw Lem as a part of.That didn’t seem to matter to Lem though.He was only looking at his stuff from a literary perspective,but that swept beneath Dick’s notice it seems.
I’ve already said as much in my last comment.
LikeLike
Pingback: exegesis with a side of fiction: the 2016 pkd read along schedule - We are book punks.We are book punks.
Yey an Ubik review! I haven’t gotten around to writing mine. I wanted to look back at some of the things he said about it in the Exegesis and take that angle instead of traditionally reviewing it, but time oh time.
Re: Dick doing drugs. According to the one biography of his I read (I Am Alive and You Are Dead–nice Ubik inspired title, eh?), he didn’t actually do that many drugs. Or well, not the kind I always used to think he had. It was kind of a revelation to hear that, though I suppose what “a lot of drugs” means is going to be relative to each person’s experience, etc. I always imagined him being, say, permanently on LSD or something. But if I recall correctly he was kind of scared of it and only did it once or twice and was largely an amphetamines man.
I would sure as hell say his work is critical of capitalism, though I do not know what I would say he imagines his ideal system or organizational structure would be… With all those coin operated things I just kept thinking “fuck these people must have to carry around change purses the size of an elephant just to leave the house.” But it worked well to up the absurdity and get a point across. I absolutely adored the Ubik ads at the beginning of each chapter, but I am particularly fond of using that weird ad tone fo voice for this sort of purpose. Wonderful.
Reading Megan’s comment I realized that by the time I read Ubik I had already forgotten so many of the details of what he said about it in the Exegesis that I was no longer influenced by its weird. I have a feeling that when I go back I am going to feel confused and probably eye rolly.
It really is too bad he threw Lem under a bus. What the fuck, PKD, you think the government is searching your house and you report some other author to the authorities. What a Dick. hahahaha. Sorry that one was just too easy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fascinating to know about Dick’s drug use, I’d always kind of assumed he ran with the California crowd that popped pills whenever. Especially with A Scanner Darkly and the list of people he know who’d been fucked up by drugs, which almost sounded like he expected to be on that list one day.
And yeah, same here about both Lem and Ubik-Exegesis. It was the paranoia like going after Lem which made me think he was knee-deep on the drugs. I’m also kind of worried I’m not retaining as much of the Exegesis, since some of the weird stuff he comes up with goes woosh over my head. But yeah, hoping it won’t be too eye rolly and confusing to return for another 75 pages.
LikeLike
Great piece Admiral, I’ve always loved this book since first reading it as a snotty teenager in the 70s. I must revisit this one later in the year now and see if it still holds up for me. All the best.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once I get out of indexing hell and get back to actually posting again, I’ll do a posting on UBIK.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your indexing project is a serious undertaking—I spent a couple weeks in 2013 doing site overhauling like that, since I didn’t like the indexing and tagging I’d been doing—but I’m sure it’ll pay dividends in the long run… Looking forward to your review after the long silence!
LikeLike
Pingback: Ubik (1969) by Philip K. Dick | From couch to moon
Fantastic review! I’m still trying to wrap my head around the story. After reading yours and then Megan’s reviews, I’m left wondering what there is left to say about this mind-warping tale.
I like your idea of it being an “existential horror story”. There are some pretty scary scenes in here. For example, the discovery of the dried out husks of some of the characters. Just like Joe Chip, we the readers are left with a big ‘wtf is going on?’ Dick has us questioning reality again and again.
One of my favorite scenes is Chip’s exhausting ascent of the stairs in the hotel, near the end. Dick’s writing is so good that it left me almost gasping for breath, too. As you’ve said, PKD’s “crazed attention to detail” is stunning at times.
Reading ‘The Exegesis’ at the same time has left me hanging on to the edge of the rabbit hole. Great idea by Nikki!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Ubik (1969) by Philip K. Dick | Who's Dreaming Who
UBIK was the book that got me hooked on Philip K. Dick. He possibly wrote better books but UBIK is the one that has stayed with me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He wrote so many books,so it was inevitable that the entire corpus would be variable in quality.However,considering his output,much of it was of a consistently high standard,and “Ubik” is probably better than most of them.
I still think “A Maze of Death” is brilliant among the earliest of his novels I read,and was truly amazed when I first read it,but as you say of “Ubik”,he’s written better books.I would probably bet both of them would be novels most SF writers wish they could have written though.
LikeLike
Pingback: Ubik; or, Adventures in Reader Reactions | MarzAat
Pingback: @reveur Tertulia literaria este Jueves: Analizando obras clásicas – kruznik